I sat through an early press call when someone froze at a single word. The press room was a pressure cooker. You could see the promotional plan tighten around that pause.
At an early press run, publicists flinched — Why Disney resisted the word ‘fascism’
I’ve watched this choreography before: studios choose tone over truth because headlines bite back. You and I both know Star Wars wears its politics on its sleeve — masked enforcers, centralized power, mass violence — and yet Disney’s marketing team asked cast and creators to avoid a plain name.
Tony Gilroy, who shepherded Andor, told The Hollywood Reporter that early interviews were coached toward safe historical language. The pitch was simple: cite precedents, talk models, speak generically about authoritarianism without spelling it out.
Is Andor about fascism?
Yes — and Gilroy never pretended otherwise once the series was free to speak plainly. He said the show was built from historical models of authoritarian behavior. I’ll tell you what that looks like on screen: administrative violence, propaganda machinery, and incremental legalism that normalizes cruelty.
On set and on stage, Diego Luna and the cast knew the stakes — How Gilroy framed the story to stay safe during press
I spoke with people who were on the road with the show: actors were briefed to avoid political matchups that might force personal confessions. That’s a deliberate PR choice. You can defend it as protecting performers, or you can call it spin control.
Gilroy’s tactic was to teach journalists a shorthand: historical comps. It let him preserve the artistry of the script while keeping interviews within a “safe” vocabulary. That’s a savvy marketing move by Lucasfilm and Disney+, but it also muffled the precise political argument the series makes.
Why didn’t Disney want ‘fascism’ used to promote Andor?
Conservative backlash, advertiser sensitivity, and the corporate instinct to minimize risk all play roles. Disney is a global brand with investors and theme-park dollars on the line. Saying “fascism” aloud in a promo cycle is a headline magnet — and headlines can become financial pain for public companies.
At critics’ screenings, viewers nodded — What Gilroy actually said and why it matters
Gilroy chose candor when he could. He told the Hollywood Reporter that the show was intentionally about authoritarianism and fascism. His line about comparing history’s patterns was meant to demystify the “prescient” label that some critics offered.
The Empire became a loom weaving a familiar pattern of control — bureaucracy, spectacle, and legalism — and the series maps those threads. That’s the second reason you should care: when creators root fiction in recognizable tactics, the story stops being allegory and starts being a field guide.
What did Tony Gilroy say about Andor and politics?
He was blunt: the team studied history, built scenes from examples, and intentionally portrayed a catalog of authoritarian moves. He also admitted they avoided the explicit label during early press to protect actors and the campaign — a small, strategic silence that preserved creative freedom while shielding the promotional engine.
You might think this is marketing theater; I think it’s a bargaining play between art and risk. Disney and Lucasfilm wanted the series to breathe without turning every interview into a political firestorm for shareholders or talent.
I’ve reviewed how PR teams at Disney+ and other streaming platforms operate. They measure headlines the way product teams measure churn. You, as a viewer and a voter, should notice the difference between a story that warns and a campaign that whispers.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Gilroy’s interview closes the loop: the show always had a named target, even if the initial publicity did not. So what will you take from a show that teaches the mechanics of control and then asks you to spot them in the real world?