My phone buzzed with three headlines at once: Jon Watts is attached to a new Star Wars film, Simon Kinberg wrote it, and it’s being called Episode X. You probably felt that split-second urge to cheer, groan, and open another tab all at once. I want to walk you through what actually matters here, and why the chatter won’t stop.
I’ve covered blockbuster rollouts, test screenings, and the rumor mills that orbit Hollywood. You’re watching a franchise that still defines tentpole cinema shift under public pressure—and your reaction is part of the story. Trust me: the headlines are one thing; the long game is another.
My feed filled with hot takes within minutes — why this announcement landed so unevenly
The first thing to understand is scale: Star Wars is not just a movie; it’s a cultural engine. When a director’s name appears next to Episode X, people react like investors watching a public offering—fast, loud, and opinionated. Some of that noise is genuine fandom; some of it is reflexive fear. You’ll see both.
Who is directing Star Wars Episode X?
Right now, trades and outlets like io9 report Jon Watts is attached. Lucasfilm hasn’t confirmed it yet, which in Hollywood-speak means the deal is likely but not inked. Watts is best known for steering Tom Holland’s early Spider-Man trilogy—movies that helped the franchise gross over $1.9 billion USD (≈ €1.7 billion) worldwide—so he brings box-office credibility and a track record of balancing spectacle with emotion.
The morning after the announcement my inbox had two camps — defenders and detractors
Fans who defend Watts point to the emotional payoff in those Spider-Man films; critics point to his uneven outings outside the franchise. On the surface it’s a classic credentials fight: can a director who made intimate, character-driven tentpoles handle cosmic myth-making?
Is Jon Watts a good choice to direct Star Wars?
I’ll be blunt: Watts has both strengths and limits. His Spider-Man films proved he can fold humor, heart, and visual energy into a blockbuster that moves audiences—think of No Way Home and the way it threaded nostalgia into a crowd-pleasing shape. But his post-Spider-Man work, like Wolfs (Brad Pitt and George Clooney), showed he can also deliver projects that feel flat and small. That inconsistency fuels valid skepticism.
I rewatched what he’s done in Star Wars itself — that changed the calculus for me
Watts isn’t coming to this franchise as a stranger. He co-created, produced, and directed episodes of Star Wars: Skeleton Crew, a series that captured childlike wonder and new corners of the galaxy. That’s important: he’s demonstrated an ability to speak the franchise’s language and to build authentic fan-first moments.
Watts’ connection to Skeleton Crew reads like a rehearsal for a larger job; it’s evidence he can shepherd a tone that feels true to Star Wars. For many fans, that practical experience outweighs one middling theatrical misfire.
On set whispers and trade patterns say something about Lucasfilm’s hiring habits
Look at the hiring timeline and you see a trend: Lucasfilm has recently favored proven, steady filmmakers—Shawn Levy before Watts—and that tells you their priority is predictability. Studios crave directors who can make a big movie that general audiences will accept and press through inevitable backlash. That’s a conservative strategy, and it’s easy to see why executives choose it.
What does Simon Kinberg’s involvement mean?
Simon Kinberg’s name provokes reaction because his résumé is mixed: he’s associated with some critically panned projects like Dark Phoenix, yet he’s also a creator and producer behind hits such as Deadpool, The Martian, and he helped create Star Wars Rebels with Dave Filoni. Kinberg has reportedly been working on these scripts since 2024, so his imprint on the trilogy is not a last-minute assignment.
His presence signals a writer-producer approach that prioritizes franchise continuity and commercial clarity. That comforts some and alarms others—depending on what you want from the next era of Star Wars.
I watched comment threads unravel on Reddit and Twitter — backlash is routine now
If you’ve followed Rian Johnson or J.J. Abrams, you know the cost of directing in this franchise. Filmmakers take on a level of scrutiny that can feel punitive: even when a movie performs, critics can turn it into a cultural referendum. That pressure steers talent choices toward safer, empathy-proof hires.
Choosing Watts reads as risk management. He’s proven he can survive loud backlash and still deliver box-office returns and streaming hits. That matters to Disney and Lucasfilm when billions are at stake.
I checked the archives and box-office tallies — context matters for how we judge decisions
Studios measure directors by both artistic currency and dollars. You and I can debate aesthetics, but the industry watches metrics: tentpole grosses, streaming retention, and brand health on platforms like Disney+ and IMDb. Watts brings demonstrable success on those metrics even if his aesthetics divide critics.
Think of him as a Swiss Army knife for franchise filmmaking—compact, versatile, and not glamorous, but ready when things get messy. That pragmatic quality is exactly what Lucasfilm seems to want right now.
There’s more to argue about here: whether this trilogy ties to the Skywalker saga, how Rey’s arc might fold in, or what it means for other announced projects. We’ll have months of leaks, trade scoops, and official statements to parse. For now, the crew has names attached, and the rest is the slow spin of studio calendars and talent availability.
Want more io9 news? Check out the best movies and TV shows to stream this month and all the upcoming sci-fi, fantasy, and horror books that should be on your radar.
So tell me: after weighing all of this, do you think Jon Watts and Simon Kinberg can steer Star Wars: Episode X where you want it to go?