The theater went quiet, then someone whispered a single line that rewired how I thought the story should end. I sat up: Kevin Williamson had sketched a different future for Ghostface after Scream 4. You feel that last-frame tension like a live wire—dangerous and impossible to ignore.
At screenings people didn’t stop talking about Jill’s exit.
I’ll say it plainly: Williamson imagined Jill (Emma Roberts) not as a defeated footnote but as a cheat who got away. In his telling, she survives Scream 4 and keeps the murders secret—a secret that would gnaw at the sequel’s spine. Instead of returning to the Sidney-versus-killers template, Williamson’s plan turned the franchise inward, centering guilt, fame, and the cost of silence.
On paper, the second trilogy was supposed to be a mirror held to fame and guilt.
Williamson told Cinepop he wanted Scream 5 to pivot: someone would figure out Jill’s secret and start killing the people around her. That forces the guilty party to fight two wars at once—protect a new life while hiding a monstrous past. I find that idea deliciously cruel: it makes the predator a fugitive in plain sight.
What would Kevin Williamson have done with Scream 5 and 6?
Williamson’s thread: Jill survives Scream 4, then becomes the hunted in Scream 5. Friends die, suspicions tighten, and the plot becomes a slow constriction around a single lie. By the time a sixth picture arrived, Gale Weathers (Courteney Cox) would have moved into the Sidney slot—older, tougher, dating someone who could be the story’s final twist.
I remember how the franchise shifted after Wes Craven’s passing and box-office slippage.
The original plan unraveled for practical reasons: Scream 4 didn’t match the financial highs of the trilogy that birthed Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), and then Craven’s death altered the franchise’s gravity. The property became television for a spell, then returned to theaters with a new creative team in 2022. What we got was a different trilogy trajectory—one that favored new faces and new motives.
Did Kevin Williamson plan to kill Dewey in Scream 5?
Yes—Williamson admits he would have killed Dewey in that fifth film. That beats against the version we actually saw and the subsequent choices made by later writers and the studio. Dewey’s death in the 2022 film mirrors Williamson’s intention, but the context and consequences would have diverged sharply under his roadmap.
I’ve followed how casting and corporate moves shape storylines.
Here’s where real-world friction mattered. Spyglass’s decision to fire Melissa Barrera over public comments about the war in Gaza set off a cascade that rerouted the later films and invited Williamson back. Skeet Ulrich has said the other filmmakers were steering toward a twist where Barrera’s character became Ghostface. Those are the sorts of behind-the-scenes avalanches that remake a planned trilogy overnight.
Is Scream 7 connected to the events of Scream 5 and 6?
The practical answer is messy: Williamson returned to steer Scream 7, and the film appears to pick which strands to honor and which to ignore—much as the 2022 Scream effectively ignored some prior beats. If you want a clean continuity, you won’t get one; if you want a story that rewrites itself mid-course, that’s precisely what happened.
There’s a pattern here you can see across Hollywood: a writer’s map meets studio detours, social controversies, and the mortality of key directors. I’ve watched franchises behave like a cracked mirror—each shard reflecting a different author’s choices.
Williamson’s version would have been intimate and poisonous, trading slasher set-pieces for suspicion that settles over characters like a slow fog. The versions produced without him favored legacy callbacks, new blood, and a kind of reflexive meta-commentary that has its own pleasures. You can argue both approaches serve the franchise’s appetite for reinvention; I argue they feed different fears.
Names matter here: Williamson, Wes Craven, Courteney Cox, Neve Campbell, Emma Roberts, Melissa Barrera, Skeet Ulrich, and the studio behind the property—Spyglass—each rewired the path forward. Cinepop reported Williamson’s comments, and outlets like io9 have cataloged how those changes shaped what audiences eventually saw.
I’ll leave you with this: a Scream trilogy that kept Jill secret would have been a moral thriller masquerading as a slasher. The one we got became a different conversation about legacy and fandom. Which set of ghosts do you want haunting the franchise—Williamson’s intimate rot, or the newer films’ broader, louder game?
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.