It’s been quite some time since 28 Days Later hit theaters, transforming Cillian Murphy into a household name and reshaping the zombie genre. This iconic film set the gold standard, and now, fans are being pulled back into its chaotic world with the much-anticipated sequel, 28 Years Later. Given its legacy, expectations were undeniably high.
So, does 28 Years Later meet the weight of its predecessor? While there are moments that resonate visually and emotionally, certain elements feel lacking compared to the undead brilliance we remember. In this review, we’ll explore the highs, lows, and whether this long-awaited follow-up was truly worth the wait.
Spoiler Warning:
This review contains some mild spoilers for 28 Years Later.
The Musical Score and BGM of 28 Years Later Were Incredible
The standout feature of 28 Years Later is undoubtedly its haunting soundtrack. This film doesn’t rely solely on shock value or gore; instead, it masterfully uses music to unsettle the audience. The score weaves an eerie tapestry of sound that lingers long after the film ends, making you think twice before switching off the lights at home.
A powerful moment comes from the chilling recitation of Rudyard Kipling’s poem “Boots, Boots, Moving Up and Down Again” by Taylor Holmes. The rhythmic delivery enhances the unsettling ambiance, drawing you deeper into the chaos and emotional turmoil experienced by the characters. This brilliant sound design elevates the film and amplifies the tension, making every escape scene feel truly heart-pounding.
The Cinematography Makes up for 28 Years Later’s Flaws
While the story may falter at times, the cinematography of 28 Years Later can almost redeem it. This film exemplifies how to visually narrate chaos and emotion. The opening sequence showcases Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) guiding his son Spike (Alfie Williams) to the mainland. Here, the visuals blur the line between apocalyptic horror and wartime trauma, effectively intertwining the two narratives.
Wide shots capture the desolation of a ravaged landscape, each frame painted like bleak poetry. This compelling imagery invites appreciation for what remains amidst the ruins, appealing to viewers who prioritize stunning visuals and atmospheric tension over a linear storyline.
However, the Story Takes Away a Huge Chunk of Potential
While the musical and visual elements deliver, the story struggles to keep pace. Set in a dystopian future, viewers follow Spike, who lives with his ailing mother Isla (Jodie Comer) and father Jamie. The narrative introduces a grim tradition where young boys are taken on “first kills” to the mainland, leading to inevitable chaos.
What stumbles the pacing is the emotional revelation when Spike witnesses his father’s infidelity. In an impulsive decision, Spike decides to take Isla on a perilous journey across the mainland for medical help. Here, the plot falters: Isla, initially too weak to rise from her sickbed, suddenly appears capable of traversing hazardous terrain, raising eyebrows.
Moreover, their initial trip is fraught with danger and near-instant infection, yet during Spike and his mother’s expedition, they encounter far fewer obstacles, which feels implausible. Sadly, this inconsistency detracts from the tension established earlier in the film.
Ultimately, the underlying narrative of 28 Years Later emerges as frustratingly underdeveloped. Had the creators dedicated comparable effort to the story as they did to crafting stunning visuals, this sequel could have rivaled its iconic predecessor. Instead, it leaves audiences yearning for more than just a beautifully crafted shell.
Should You Watch 28 Years Later?
With all these points laid out, is 28 Years Later worth your time? The answer depends on what you seek in a film experience. The aesthetics, from stunning cinematography to the chilling soundtrack, certainly shine. However, when it comes to a solid story, it lacks the depth many hope for.
While themes of love and loss are present, they don’t mask the deficiencies of the plot. Do you prefer strong narratives that resonate? If so, this film may leave you wanting more. However, if you appreciate atmospheric films that prioritize visual storytelling and mood, you might find enjoyment here. Just approach with tempered expectations.
In summary, while the story may falter, the artistic elements are captivating. So, think carefully before booking your tickets. Know what you’re signing up for. Although the narrative may stumble, everything else could mesmerize you. For more insights on films and more, feel free to explore related content on Moyens I/O.