In dramaland, leading ladies often find themselves torn between the love of two equally attractive men — a choice none of us would want to make! But what if you did have to pick between the frustrating lawyer and the adorkable police officer? In this weekly feature, we ask you to make the difficult decisions — and we aren’t limiting our options to dreamy oppas.
Vote via the poll and feel free to use the comments to explain exactly how you were able to choose! So, Beanies:
WOULD YOU RATHER #34 RESULTS
The latest round of Would You Rather is another close one, with the option to attend a blind date — courtesy of your parents — just barely edging out the alternative of playing matchmaker for your sworn enemies. Whenever the results are this close, I know y’all either love both options or hate them, and I think, in this case, it’s safe to say most of you were picking the lesser of two evils.
So what made the blind date option slightly more appealing? Well, for most of you, like @kurama and @mmmmm, you were attracted to the option that came with food — potentially free food if your parents or date are willing to foot the bill. (I get it.) Plus, if you’re like @asianromance, who pointed out that we’re talking about a single date, then the blind date is the less time-consuming option. As @sspat said, “time is too precious” to waste on people you hate.
And yet… a lot of you would rather play matchmaker for your enemies. @marianlin was optimistic that the experience would be rather fun, trying to match their enemy with the “worst and weirdest dates,” and @gikata and @jls943 agreed that playing matchmaker could be a satisfying form of revenge, especially if you pair your enemies together so they can make each other miserable, like in Marry My Husband.