The inbox pinged. A knot tightened in my stomach as I saw the sender: U.S. Department of Justice. Inside, a digital paper trail threatened to rewrite history, suggesting a connection that had previously been denied. Emails released on Friday reveal that Elon Musk had more than just a passing acquaintance with Jeffrey Epstein, hinting at planned visits to the infamous Little St. James island in 2012 and 2014.
While previous releases hinted at invitations, these new missives show Musk expressing a clear interest in visiting. The implications ripple far beyond a simple social call.
The Invitation
Think back to 2012. Barack Obama was president, and “Gangnam Style” dominated the airwaves. It was also the year Jeffrey Epstein extended an invitation to Elon Musk.
“IF you find some time , come vist [sic] me on my island in the caribean. [sic] bring=your friend or friends. i will be there most of nov and dec,” Epstein wrote Sept. 12, 2012.
“Sounds good, will try to make it,” Musk replied in an email from Sept. 25, 2012.
By November, plans seemed firmer, with Epstein mentioning a “heli” for Musk and his companions.
“How many people will you be for the heli to island,” Epstein wrote Musk on Nov. 24, 2012.
“Probably just Talulah and me. What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?” Musk replied.
What was Jeffrey Epstein’s island used for?
While Epstein claimed it was a private retreat, Little St. James became synonymous with horrific allegations of sex trafficking and abuse. Its dark reputation now casts a long shadow over anyone associated with it.
2013: Holiday Plans
Fast forward to December 2013. Miley Cyrus’ “Wrecking Ball” was inescapable, and Musk was apparently coordinating a visit to Epstein in the British Virgin Islands.
“Will be in the BVI/St Bart’s area over the holidays. Is there a good time t= [sic] visit?” Musk wrote Dec. 13, 2013, referring to the British Virgin Islands.
“any day 1st – 8th . play it by ear if you want. always space for you,” Epstein replied on Dec. 15, 2013.
“Ok, probably the 1st then,” Musk responded the same day.
The conversation continues, adjusting dates and hinting at missing emails. By Christmas, the rendezvous was seemingly set for January 2nd or 3rd.
“the 2 or 3 would be perfect. I will come and get you,” Epstein wrote in an email Dec. 25, 2013.
“I need to fly back to LA on the night of the 2nd, so w,” Musk replied. It’s not clear if there’s supposed to be more to that “w.”
About an hour later, Musk sent another email to Epstein, writing, “Actually, I could fly back early on the 3rd. We will be in St Bart’s. When =hould [sic] we head to your island on the 2nd?”
Contradicting Statements
These emails clash with Musk’s previous statements. In September, amid swirling speculation, Musk claimed Epstein tried to get him to visit the island, but he “REFUSED.” Was this a simple misremembering, or something more deliberate? This is where things get murky.
The emails suggest Musk was open to, even eager for, a visit that ultimately didn’t happen because Epstein was called back to New York. The exchange ends with Epstein lamenting the missed opportunity for “just fun” and Musk responding, “No problem.”
“Bad news- Unfortunately , my schedule will keep me in New York,” Epstein wrote on Dec. 30, 2013. “I was rea=ly [sic] looking forward to finally spending some time together with just fun as=the agenda. so i am very disappointed. Hopefully we can schedule anothe= [sic] time in the near future.”
Elon Musk’s reply an hour and a half later: “No problem.”
The following week, another email exchange reveals Epstein “getting over” the missed connection. Musk replies simply: “Great.”
On Jan. 6, 2014, Epstein emailed Musk again, though it’s not clear if some of the emails are missing, given the abrupt tone: “sorry it didn’t work , out just getting over it. how was your trip?” Musk’s reply later that day: “Great.”
What kind of person was Jeffrey Epstein?
Beyond the island and the legal proceedings, understanding Jeffrey Epstein requires grappling with his carefully constructed persona: a complex mix of wealth, influence, and alleged depravity that allowed him to operate with impunity for years. He cultivated relationships with the rich and powerful, and some of those relationships are now under intense scrutiny.
The “Facility”
One email, dated February 2013, mentions a “facility.” The context is vague, leaving room for speculation.
“look forward to seeing you. I can either come wtih [sic] assistants ( four , ) =or alone. They might enjoy the facility if ok with you,” Epstein wrote.
Musk replied, “Up to you.”
St. Bart’s Lunch
Another email chain from January suggests a lunch meeting in St. Bart’s, with Musk accompanied by Talulah Riley, his then-wife, and a friend.
“anytime tonororw in st abarths?” Epstein wrote Musk on Jan. 3, 2013.
“Could meet for lunch. Will be with Talulah and her friend Debs,” Musk replied. Talulah is the name of Musk’s first wife Talulah Riley, the British actress to whom he was married from 2010-2012 and then again from 2013-2016.
“I will land at 12 , anytime after great, look forward to it,” Epstein replied.
“Anyplace here that you like to have lunch?” Musk asked. It remains unclear if further emails exist in the vast document release.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s Role
According to Ghislaine Maxwell, she met Musk at Sergey Brin’s birthday party around 2010 or 2011, with Epstein absent. Maxwell’s involvement adds another layer of complexity to the story. Her conviction further taints any association with the pair. These connections are more than just a series of unfortunate coincidences. They create a tapestry of relationships that demands closer inspection.
Did anyone famous visit Epstein’s island?
The guest list of Epstein’s island has been a subject of intense public interest. While many names have surfaced, definitive proof remains elusive in several cases. The speculation, however, underscores the unease surrounding Epstein’s circle.
More To Come?
These released files represent only a portion of what’s expected. Representatives Robert Garcia and Ro Khana have voiced concerns about the withholding of potentially relevant documents.
Rep. Ro Khana, also from California, said, “The DOJ said it identified over 6 million potentially responsive pages but is releasing only about 3.5 million after review and redactions. This raises questions as to why the rest are being withheld.”
Todd Blanche insisted all relevant documents have been released, denying any protection for Donald Trump. The sheer volume of information guarantees further revelations, even without a “smoking gun” implicating Trump.
The newly released emails between Musk and Epstein can be found in documents EFTA02357372, EFTA02362483, EFTA02364818, EFTA02364941, and EFTA02356830, all part of Data Set 11.
As we sift through these digital breadcrumbs, the question lingers: what else remains hidden, and what will it reveal about the circles of power surrounding Jeffrey Epstein?