This story was originally published by ProPublica.
ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.
Gun Owners Demand Investigation into Secret NRA Data Practices
A coalition advocating for firearms owners has formally requested an investigation from three federal agencies regarding the practices of the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a prominent gun industry lobbying group. They allege that the NSSF misused confidential information on firearms buyers for political gains.
Background of the Allegations
The request for an investigation comes on the heels of a detailed investigation by ProPublica. The report revealed that the NSSF allegedly shared sensitive personal data of gun buyers with political operatives, despite portraying itself as a staunch defender of gun owners’ privacy. This clandestine program reportedly lasted nearly two decades and has been termed “underhanded” by Gun Owners for Safety.
The Demand for Accountability
Malcolm Smith, a member of Gun Owners for Safety, emphasized that privacy issues surrounding gun ownership transcend political lines. He stated, “No matter the industry, exploiting customers’ private data like their underwear size and children’s ages in a secret scheme is reprehensible and cannot be permitted.”
About Gun Owners for Safety
Since its inception in 2019, Gun Owners for Safety has been linked to Giffords, a gun violence prevention group co-founded by former Arizona Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. The organization boasts chapters across nine states and includes gun owners and Second Amendment advocates who support what they refer to as “common-sense” measures aimed at curbing gun-related fatalities.
Official Responses to the Investigation Request
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has acknowledged receipt of the investigation letter, but refrained from further commentary. The FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with the NSSF, have not responded to inquiries from ProPublica.
NSSF’s Position on Data Collection
The NSSF has defended its data collection strategies, asserting that their activities were legal and within the agreed terms with manufacturers, data brokers, and other involved entities. Though less recognized than the National Rifle Association (NRA), the NSSF holds a significant position within the firearms, political, and business sectors.
Legislative Support for Investigation
Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has shown support for the investigation, agreeing with the concerns raised by Smith. Previously, in November, Blumenthal had requested clarity from the NSSF regarding the companies that provided data to their database and the nature of the information shared. The NSSF has not responded to these queries.
The Implications of Data Misuse
Experts in privacy law have mentioned that the actions of companies supplying information to the NSSF could infringe upon federal and state laws prohibiting deceptive business practices. Under federal regulations, organizations are mandated to adhere to their stated privacy policies and must be transparent about the usage of consumer data.
The ProPublica Investigation Findings
ProPublica’s inquiry uncovered that at least ten manufacturers, including well-known names like Glock, Smith & Wesson, and Remington, submitted extensive user data, often without customer consent. This data was compiled into a large database aimed at mobilizing electoral support for candidates favored by the gun industry.
Public Reaction and Concerns
Following the revelations, ProPublica contacted approximately 6,000 individuals from the NSSF database. The nearly unanimous sentiment among those who responded, including many gun owners, was one of outrage and surprise upon discovering their inclusion in the database without their knowledge.
Smith’s Personal Perspective on the Matter
In his letter to authorities, Smith highlighted FBI director Kash Patel’s advocacy for gun owners’ privacy rights, urging the agency to recognize the risks associated with maintaining undisclosed databases about firearm owners. With a background as a retired J.P. Morgan executive and a lifelong gun enthusiast, Smith’s perspective shifted after witnessing a rise in extremism within gun rights advocacy.
Final Thoughts on Privacy and Data Security
Smith articulated the growing urgency surrounding the issue: “The initial disclosures about the National Shooting Sports Foundation were an alarm bell. But now this is a four-alarm fire.” He expressed concern that both private data and privacy are under threat, underscoring the need for stricter regulations in data handling.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. Why is the NSSF being investigated?
The NSSF is under scrutiny for allegedly misusing sensitive personal information of gun buyers for political purposes, raising concerns about privacy violations.
2. What does Gun Owners for Safety advocate for?
Gun Owners for Safety promotes “common-sense” measures to reduce gun violence, including improved background checks and safety regulations among gun owners.
3. What are the potential legal implications for the NSSF?
Experts suggest that the NSSF may have violated federal and state laws concerning deceptive business practices, particularly regarding transparency in data handling.
4. How have gun owners reacted to the data disclosures?
Many gun owners have expressed outrage and surprise at finding their personal information utilized without consent in advocacy campaigns.
5. What kind of information was shared by the NSSF?
The NSSF collected a range of personal data from gun buyers, including names and addresses, and reportedly enhanced it with external data for electoral targeting.