In recent weeks, I’ve been testing the Whoop 5.0 and Oura Ring 4 to monitor my sleep and daily activities. These devices stand out as health trackers without distractions; they lack screens, phone notifications, and app support typical of smartwatches.
Choosing between these two options can feel overwhelming. You’re likely curious about their similarities, differences, and which will keep you more informed and motivated. Let’s dive into what I discovered.
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: Specs and Features
| Oura Ring 4 | Whoop 5.0 | |
| Dimensions | 7.9mm wide, 2.88mm thick smart ring | 34 x 24 x 10mm fitness band |
| Weight | 3.3 grams to 5.5 grams | 28 grams for Whoop with band |
| Durability | 100m water resistance, titanium ring | IP68 |
| Sensors | Heart rate, blood oxygen, skin temperature, accelerometer | Heart rate, blood oxygen, skin temperature, accelerometer, ECG (Whoop only), blood pressure monitoring (Whoop only) |
| Battery Life | Five days | 14 days |
| Subscription | Monthly | Annually |
| Price | From $350 (€325) + $6 (€5.50) per month | From $199 (€180) annually |
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: Design
The Whoop 5.0 is designed as a wristband, while the Oura Ring 4 sits stylishly on your finger. This key difference simplifies the choice for some; no sizing is required for the Whoop. However, it may take a bit to adjust to wearing a ring if you’re not accustomed to it. Once you do, the Oura Ring feels light and unobtrusive.
The Whoop 5.0 is lightweight and made from soft and flexible materials, promoting comfort for all-day wear, although its gym-oriented design lacks aesthetic appeal. It’s noticeable on your wrist, raising curious questions from those around you. On the other hand, the Oura Ring is elegant, and despite its sturdy titanium body, it does require care to prevent scratches.
Both trackers are water-resistant; the Oura Ring can handle dives up to 100 meters, while Whoop has an IP68 rating. However, the Whoop’s band could be less prone to wear over time compared to the Oura, which is prone to scratches due to its finger placement. Personally, I lean towards the smart ring for its subtlety and allure, but that may differ based on individual preferences.
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: App and Connectivity
I’ve used both trackers paired with an iPhone 16 Pro Max, and both apps connect effortlessly on Android devices as well. The Oura Ring’s app is designed to be user-friendly, focusing on essential metrics with intuitive visuals. In contrast, the Whoop app is data-heavy, which might feel overwhelming at first.
The Oura app effectively highlights important metrics, making them accessible at a glance. Its design employs colors to pinpoint outliers, ensuring you easily grasp your readiness, sleep, and activity scores. Alternatively, the Whoop app dives deep into data, crammed with options that require time to navigate.
Which app offers better insights? The Oura app promotes a balanced lifestyle without obsessing over calories. Conversely, the Whoop app endeavors to provide in-depth performance analysis, guiding you towards improvement. Ultimately, if you’re seeking motivation and detailed examination, the Whoop app could suit you better.
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: Health Tracking
When it comes to sleep tracking, the Oura Ring provides a straightforward Sleep Score, while the Whoop app presents a percentage. Both convey valuable information, but finding sleep details in the Oura app is far more straightforward.
The Oura Ring excels in automatically detecting workouts, effectively capturing activity duration. The Whoop may struggle occasionally, highlighting a potential disparity in workout recognition. Both devices accurately measure heart rates, showcasing comprehensive GPS tracking. If you’re serious about fitness, the Whoop delivers a more robust live activity tracking experience.
Additionally, the Whoop app features a Strength Trainer function, which some may find useful, offering various guided workouts. The Oura app, however, includes relaxation techniques and breathwork that might benefit those seeking tranquility.
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: Special Features
The Whoop 5.0 boasts an array of special features, including the Healthspan and Pace of Aging functionalities, which offer actionable insights to improve overall health. In contrast, the Oura Ring employs partnerships to provide value but lacks the analytical depth present in Whoop’s offerings.
For instance, the Oura Ring shows a general Resilience metric, which falls short compared to Whoop’s detailed suggestions for enhancement. Furthermore, if you subscribe to Whoop’s higher-tier plan, you gain access to advanced monitoring capabilities like ECG and blood pressure tracking.
While Oura offers a Symptom Radar to gauge your physical well-being, Whoop’s comprehensive insights highlight opportunities for improvement, such as focusing on strength training or better sleep habits.
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: Subscription Cost Comparison
Examining cost, Whoop’s subscription plans can be perceived as low-cost but reveal limitations upon closer inspection. The base plan lacks many features, while the Oura Ring offers a single clear subscription that covers everything. If you stop paying for Oura, you’ll still retain access to basic metrics, unlike Whoop, which restricts all data when payment lapses.
| Oura Ring 4 | Whoop 5.0 One | Whoop Peak | Whoop MG Life | |
| Hardware Cost | From $349 (€325) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| One Year Subscription (Total) | $72 (€65) | $199 (€180) | $239 (€220) | $359 (€330) |
| Two Year Subscription (Total) | $144 (€130) | $299 (€270) | $399 (€360) | $599 (€540) |
Whoop 5.0 vs Oura Ring 4: Which One Should You Buy?
Choosing between the Whoop 5.0 and the Oura Ring 4 is straightforward. If you’re serious about fitness and want an in-depth analysis of your workouts, the Whoop is the better investment. However, if you’re more focused on a lifestyle-oriented product that integrates seamlessly into daily life, the Oura Ring shines in design and functionality.
Both wearables meet their promised battery life—up to five days for the Oura Ring and 14 days for the Whoop 5.0. You won’t sacrifice accuracy with either device, as both offer a solid overview of your health metrics. If you’re after depth and detail, Whoop excels, while for a quick glance at vital statistics, Oura is top-notch.
My experience with the Whoop 5.0 has surprised me positively, especially with its updated app aiming at a wider audience. Yet, I am inclined towards the Oura Ring’s lifestyle approach and aesthetic appeal. Ultimately, both devices are fantastic choices; it comes down to what fits your lifestyle best. Whichever you choose, you’re bound to be satisfied.
Continue exploring related content on Moyens I/O for more insights and updates.