In 2024, the Biden administration took a significant step by banning the last form of asbestos still used in the United States, driven by its alarming links to cancer. On the other hand, the Trump administration is reconsidering this ban, raising questions about protecting public health. Recently, the New York Times highlighted that the EPA under Trump’s leadership plans to delay the ban and reevaluate the regulations regarding this hazardous material, seemingly downplaying the dangers of asbestos exposure.
The focus here is on chrysotile asbestos, commonly referred to as “white asbestos.” Despite efforts to phase it out, it is still present in various products like roofing materials, textiles, and automotive parts, including brake pads. Its usage persists even though this material has been linked to serious health conditions like lung cancer, ovarian cancer, laryngeal cancer, and mesothelioma—cancers affecting the linings of vital organs. The EPA estimates that over 40,000 deaths in the U.S. are attributed to asbestos exposure annually.
Given these alarming statistics, it’s no surprise that more than 50 countries have outright banned asbestos. The United States joined this movement in 2024 when the Biden administration implemented a ban, though it came with a lengthy 12-year phase-out period. Under this rule, complete prohibition wouldn’t occur until 2036, which raises concerns about the sufficiency of this timeline.
But how can chemical manufacturers adapt to a policy with such a long adjustment period? The current administration seems to think that scrapping the rule entirely might be simpler. According to the Times, the Trump administration is contemplating lifting the ban on importing and utilizing asbestos in chlorine production and sheet gaskets used in chemical manufacturing.
If you’re puzzled about why the Trump administration would even consider revisiting such a straightforward ban—especially for a government that claims to prioritize American health—there’s a clear answer: lobbying influences decision-making. As reported in the Times, the reconsideration was spearheaded by Lynn Dekleva, who previously worked for the American Chemistry Council, where she opposed regulations on the carcinogen formaldehyde. Her extensive experience at DuPont—known for its production of notoriously dangerous “forever chemicals”—now places her in charge of chemical approvals at the EPA. The implications for public safety are concerning.
What are the health risks associated with asbestos exposure? Asbestos exposure can lead to serious diseases, including lung cancer and mesothelioma, a particularly aggressive cancer affecting the linings of several internal organs.
Why did the Biden administration impose a ban only now, when many countries have done so earlier? The ban reflects growing awareness and mounting evidence about the dangers of asbestos, aligning the U.S. with global health standards to protect citizens.
What products are still made with chrysotile asbestos? Common products include certain roofing materials, automotive components like brake pads, and some textiles and cement products.
How does asbestos exposure relate to workplace safety? Workers in industries that produce or use asbestos are at increased risk for serious health issues due to prolonged exposure, highlighting the need for stringent safety regulations.
As events unfold, it’s vital to stay informed about the health implications of asbestos use and the regulatory changes regarding it. Awareness not only impacts public health policy but also encourages safer practices in industries that still rely on harmful materials. For further insights and updates, explore additional content on Moyens I/O.