Recently, the White House took an unusual step by commissioning a history exhibit in Washington, D.C., created by the controversial education organization PragerU. This exhibit displays 82 paintings and 40 AI-generated videos, all of which present a skewed interpretation of America’s founding.
Even more troubling, some of the AI-generated videos feature fabricated quotes attributed to the founding fathers. For instance, in a video portraying John Adams, he states, “facts do not care about our feelings,” a phrase popularized by far-right commentators like Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk.
This raises the question: what kinds of quotes are we seeing? The online video of this AI-generated Adams can be found on PragerU’s website, showcasing their commitment to a certain narrative, despite being rooted in fiction.
It’s worth noting the irony that the video’s closed captioning reads “your feelings” instead of “our feelings,” a minor detail that reflects PragerU’s typical attention to accuracy.
This new display, titled the Founders Museum, is part of the build-up to the semiquincentennial celebration in 2026, which commemorates 250 years of American history. PragerU collaborated with the White House Task Force 250 to develop this exhibit, as reported by NPR.
Linda McMahon, Secretary of Education, appears in a promotional video on PragerU’s site, stating that “patriotic education does not mean propaganda.” In a recent speech, she even referred to AI as “A1,” reminiscent of steak sauce. This raises concerns about the quality of education being promoted.
The videos feature various AI glitches, including characters with bizarre anatomical inaccuracies, demonstrating the current limitations of generative AI in depicting human figures authentically.
PragerU has a reputation for oversimplifying or outright distorting historical narratives. One viral video depicts Christopher Columbus chastising children for critiquing his role in slavery, suggesting that being enslaved is preferable to death—a deeply troubling assertion.
The unsettling part is that such a version of history is gaining traction and even validation from the U.S. government. The videos frequently mention religious themes, aligning with PragerU’s founder, Dennis Prager, who promotes “Judeo-Christian values.”
Alongside the larger fabrications, there are numerous small inconsistencies in the historical narratives presented. For example, Samuel Adams reportedly describes being labeled a “troublemaker,” a term that didn’t emerge until decades after his death. While minor, such inaccuracies are surprising given the weight of history.
Despite being an unaccredited institution with no formal classes or diplomas, PragerU’s materials have made their way into classrooms across at least ten states, including Alaska, Arizona, and Florida. This expansion signifies a growing influence among younger audiences.
Concerns about educational integrity are echoed by Donald Trump, who openly critiques institutions like the Smithsonian for presenting a nuanced view of history. He has expressed indignation over discussions surrounding slavery, insisting that its negative aspects shouldn’t be emphasized.
As PragerU’s content becomes more normalized, there’s a legitimate concern about the impact this selective history could have on future generations. Strikingly, as institutions face mounting pressure, many in leadership positions appear hesitant to push back.
What are the broader implications of this trend? A critical examination of our past is essential for understanding our present and future. Disregarding uncomfortable truths will only perpetuate ignorance.
What is the role of AI in shaping history lessons today? The increasing use of AI in educational materials is undoubtedly convenient, but it raises questions about reliability and accuracy.
How can parents navigate the influence of organizations like PragerU? Staying informed and discussing the importance of historical accuracy with children is crucial in fostering critical thinking.
What is the future of history education in America? With evolving narratives and digital tools like AI, the landscape of education is constantly shifting, requiring vigilance to ensure a well-rounded understanding.
As we grapple with these issues, it’s clear that the journey toward a more informed society requires engaging with diverse perspectives and rooting our education in factual history. For those keen to explore more about the intersection of education, history, and current debates, continue your journey at Moyens I/O.