AI Avatars in Court: A Cautionary Tale for Self-Representation

While it’s generally advised against, representing oneself in court can sometimes seem tempting. However, an even less advisable route is to claim you’re self-representing while instead utilizing an AI avatar. This controversial approach led to significant backlash in a recent case involving AI entrepreneur Jerome Dewald, as reported by The Register.

The Case of Jerome Dewald and MassMutual Metro New York

Jerome Dewald found himself embroiled in an employment dispute with the insurance company MassMutual Metro New York. During a scheduled court appearance on March 26, 2025, Dewald, who has battled throat cancer for 25 years, sought permission to submit a video statement. This request was granted, which initially seemed reasonable.

Unexpected Twist: An AI Avatar Takes Center Stage

However, the court was unprepared for what Dewald submitted. Instead of a personal statement, the video featured a generic avatar—an AI-generated individual rather than the plaintiff himself. Associate Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels promptly interrupted the video, questioning, “Is that counsel for the case?” Dewald then revealed the truth: the statement was delivered by an AI avatar, which he admitted was not a real person.

Judicial Backlash: Consequences of Misleading the Court

The judge’s reaction was less than favorable. “It would have been nice to know that when you made your application. You did not tell me that, sir,” Justice Manzanet-Daniels expressed, pointing out that Dewald had previously communicated with the court without issues. “I don’t appreciate being misled. So either you are suffering from an ailment that prevents you from being able to articulate or you aren’t,” she concluded, emphasizing the seriousness of the matter.

Dewald’s AI Startup: Making Legal Self-Representation Simpler

It’s worth noting that Dewald is the founder of Pro Se Pro, a startup focused on assisting individuals in representing themselves in legal matters through AI tools—a fact the judge acknowledged with her stern remark, “You are not going to use this courtroom as a launch for your business, sir.”

The AI That Went Wrong: A Failed Attempt

Interestingly, Dewald disclosed that the avatar used wasn’t even generated by his own platform, which has been stagnant due to funding issues. Instead, the AI persona named “Jim” was created using a free trial of another service called Tavus. When Dewald encountered issues creating a personalized avatar, he opted for “one of their stock replicas, that big, beautiful hunk of a guy” instead.

A Lesson in Transparency: Moving Forward After Court

Ultimately, the court’s reprimand served as a crucial lesson for Dewald. He proceeded to present his case personally, acknowledging that he should have disclosed his intentions to use an AI representation. This episode highlights the importance of honesty and transparency in legal matters, particularly when incorporating advanced technologies like AI.

FAQ: AI in Legal Representation

Is it legal to use AI for self-representation in court?

Yes, using AI tools can assist in self-representation, but transparency with the court is essential to avoid misunderstandings.

Can I submit a video statement in court?

Submitting a video statement may be possible, but court approval is required, and the content must adhere to procedural norms.

What are the risks of using AI avatars in legal proceedings?

Risks include misleading the court, potential ethical violations, and the possibility of damaging your credibility as a litigant.

How can AI assist in legal matters?

AI can help individuals prepare legal documents, research case law, and provide guidance on self-representation.

What should I consider before self-representing in court?

Evaluate your understanding of the legal issues, the complexity of your case, and the implications of representing yourself without professional assistance.

This incident serves as a reminder that while technology can enhance self-representation, adhering to courtroom protocols and maintaining transparency with the court is paramount.