I was scrolling Threads when James Gunn’s short reply stopped me cold: he’s “already in it.” You can feel the quiet momentum—hours of rewrites and meetings folding into one relentless question: what will he shoot next? For someone with Gunn’s track record, silence is rarely empty; it’s a room where a script is being born, like a mechanic tinkering under the hood.
On Threads last Sunday I saw Gunn say he was “already in it” — and that tiny line tells you everything about how projects move in Hollywood
I’ve followed filmmakers who leak plans by accident and those who are surgical with every tease. Gunn’s short answer on Threads functions like both: a tease and a signal. You and I both know a public hint from a director of his stature doesn’t happen in a vacuum—agents, producers, and studio chairs have already drawn the map.
He also said the assembly cut of Man of Tomorrow is finished, which explains the timing. Directors don’t write in the quiet after a film; they write when the calendar allows breathing room and when leverage is at its highest. Right now Gunn has both.
What is James Gunn working on next?
If you want the shorthand: the answer could be a DC film, or something that keeps his momentum while the studio sorts schedules. Gunn didn’t specify a universe. That ambiguity is the point. It lets him float possibilities—another Superman movie, a Straczynski-scale reinvention, or a wildly specific solo pitch for a character like Rick Flag Sr.
I’ll say this plainly: studios tolerate speculation if the filmmaker delivers. At Warner Bros. and Skydance, his name is currency. You see how that plays out when a director’s words on Threads become a market move—reporters chase it, talent floats, and the package grows wings.
In the week before this, the studio landscape shifted — and that shift matters because it changes what projects get greenlit
Last week’s headlines confirmed Gunn and Peter Safran would stay at Warner Bros., and that stability is a safety valve. You may have seen stories about Supergirl underperforming and other projects being quietly shelved; those are the sorts of losses that make studios tighten their grip on risk.
That said, retention of leadership is not a guarantee of boldness; it’s a recalibration. Skydance’s interest in Gunn after his move has always been measured by what he brings back to the table—audience trust, franchise potential, and a willingness to shepherd projects across years. He’s a brand-builder as much as a filmmaker, which is why starting another script while an assembly cut is being polished is smart leverage.
How safe is James Gunn at Skydance?
“Safe” isn’t the word I’d use; “in demand” fits better. Skydance and Warner Bros. both have reasons to keep him—he delivers headline-making properties and a steady creative voice. If you follow industry patterns, a director who can move between studio leadership and independent teams is effectively untouchable for a while.
Still, the market’s cold logic applies. Talent deals hinge on results. Underperforming titles change calculus quickly, and the lesson studios learned from recent DC releases is that audience goodwill can be fragile. Gunn’s next move has to protect that goodwill while offering a clear commercial path.
On the slate you can point to three clear signposts — and they help you guess what Gunn might be planning
Right now DC’s public roadmap includes Man of Tomorrow, Clayface, and Creature Commandos season two. That narrow pipeline matters because it creates scarcity. Scarcity in franchises often forces creators into specific choices: expand the mainline universe, explore a cult favorite, or pivot to a smaller, character-driven piece.
Given Gunn’s taste and history, he can choose a studio-safe sequel or something that tests a boundary—an offbeat solo story that only he could sell. Either path amplifies his profile, but one keeps the shared universe intact while the other gives him breathing room to reshape audience expectations like a lighthouse in a storm.
In private rooms, the calculus is simple: what will move the needle and preserve options?
I’ve been in notes sessions where the first question is never creative—it’s strategic. What keeps the studio flexible? What gives the director enough control to make a movie that critics and audiences will defend? For Gunn, those questions matter now more than ever.
You should expect him to protect royalties, staffing, and release windows while he writes. That’s the maneuvering that turns a Threads tease into a real production schedule.
Want more io9 news? Check out the best movies and TV shows to stream this month and all the upcoming sci-fi, fantasy, and horror books that should be on your radar.
So where does that leave us? Gunn’s public hint is a classic Hollywood power play: say just enough to steer attention, not so much that the room fills with competing agendas. If you had to bet, would you back another Superman-style tentpole, a surprising character study, or a smaller gamble that keeps the universe flexible?